Intertemporal Choice and Consumption Mobility

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Wealth Distribution and Social Mobility in the US: A Quantitative Approach (2015, methodology): “For example, Hurd and Smith (2003) use the HRS to characterize such distributions and find the bequests are very skewed, just as the cross-sectional wealth.”
Consumption and Saving: Models of Intertemporal Allocation and Their Implications for Public Policy (2010, unknown): “In an ingenious paper, Jappelli and Pistaferri (2006) exploit that idea by looking explicitly at movements in the relative ranking in the consumption distribution in an Italian survey.”
Code and data files for "Does Consumption Inequality Track Income Inequality in Italy?" (2009, background): “This paper draws attention to some of the data that can be used by applied research to analyze these reforms by presenting some stylized facts on labor supply, income, consumption, and wealth drawn from the Survey of Household Income and Wealth (SHIW), a representative survey of the Italian…”
Earnings, consumption and lifecycle choices (2010, background): “…over the lifecycle, as originally documented by Deaton and Paxson (1994); the fact that mobility in income exceed mobility in consumption (Jappelli and Pistaferri, 2006); and the fact that the consumption distribution is more lognormal than the income distribution (Battistin, Blundell…”