Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence

By David Wheeler. 2006

368 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea5af07043564659bb415b6a40bbae5d8c04c1d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Green Solow model (2010, unknown): “A review of these and other competing explanations appears in Chap. 2 of Copeland and Taylor (2003) .”
Investigating the asymmetric linkages between infrastructure development, green innovation, and consumption-based material footprint: Novel empirical estimations from highly resource-consuming economies (2021, background): “Numerous studies elucidate that globalization plays an important role in shaping efficient 462 material usage and developing environmental sustainability (Copeland & Taylor, 2013).”
Technology, International Trade, and Pollution from U.S. Manufacturing (2007, background): “2 See, for example, Grossman and Krueger (1993) or Copeland and Taylor (2005).”
Pollution Haven and Corruption Paradise (2017, unknown): “The budget constraint is then given by P M + p A A = Y , where p A is the price of the agricultural good 10 In its comment of Copeland and Taylor (2003), Anderson (2005) put it di(cid:27)erently (cid:16)The Copeland and Taylor model is one in which capital (cid:29)ows and trade (cid:29)ows are…”
Trade Openness and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Belt and Road Countries (2019, background): “This results in the movement of the polluting sector from industrialized nations to underdeveloped economies [30].”
Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness: Evidence from Romania (2012, unknown): “(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) xijt xijt xijt xijt xijt xijt 1.”
Agriculture, Trade Openness and Emissions: An Empirical Analysis and Policy Options (2016, methodology): “Indeed, using country-level data, Antweiler et al. (2001) and Copeland and Taylor (2003) document that increases in the volume of trade can result in increased pollution emissions in the United States, indicating that trade liberalisation processes may actually shift the composition of US…”
Marginal abatement cost curves in general equilibrium: The influence of world energy prices (2006, methodology): “Ellerman and Decaux (1998) use the EPPA model and run it with proportional reductions by all OECD countries of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 and 40% of 2010 emissions and fit simple analytical curves to the sets of plots.”
Economic Growth, Industrialization, and the Environment (2012, methodology): “Following Copeland and Taylor (1994), I assume each unit of industrial activity, F, generates units of pollution as a joint output.”
Pollution, Shadow Economy and Corruption: Theory and Evidence (2012, unknown): “A higher share of value added in the industry andmanufacturingmay be accompanied by higher emissions (Dinda et al., 2000; Friedl and Getzner, 2003).We also account for the efficiency of energy consumption. Increasing energy efficiency implies a better use of energy. For a given level of production, ”
FDI and environmental regulations in China (2008, background): “Copeland and Taylor (2003) develop a model linking the firm’s production and abatement cost.”
FDI and environmental regulation: pollution haven or a race to the top? (2012, background): “Substituting (44) and (9), into (4), one sees that the optimal quantity of the southern rms exports to the North can be reduced to”
Structural analysis of international trade: Environmental impacts of Norway (2006, background): “Jayadevappa and Chhatre, 2000 ; Copeland and Taylor, 2003 ), very few studies have considered the linkages between consumption and production in international production chains.”
Does rising income increase or decrease damage risk from natural disasters (2008, background): “The heart of our argument, which is based on intuition borrowed from the formal results derived in Copeland and Taylor (2003), is that consumers may very well arrive at different decisions on how much income to trade off to mitigate disaster risk depending on their baseline level of consumption.”