Population Viability Analysis

By Michael Schaub, Marc Kéry. Integrated Population Models, 2022

376 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract The following critiques express the opinions of the individual evaluators regarding the strengths, weaknesses, and value of the books they review. As such, the appraisals are subjective assessments and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors or any official policy of the American Ornithologists' Union.

Subfields: Ecology, Parasitology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea5429d04e47cf513538b6fbec691c13d364f73f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Sabo
2. P. Kareiva
3. Elizabeth E. Holmes

In Parasitology

1. J. Sabo
2. P. Kareiva
3. Elizabeth E. Holmes

Citations in the corpus

• Efficacy of simple viability models in ecological risk assessment: Does density dependence matter? (2004, methodology): “…the end of the period when parameters are estimated (i.e., the fitting interval), then simple DA methods will produce inaccurate risk estimates because the dynamics during the fitting period will be quite different than that during the subsequent observation period (Boyce 1992, Beissinger 1995).”