High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease

By Ø. Rognmo, Eva V Hetland, J. Helgerud, J. Hoff, S. Slørdahl. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, 2004

723 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Physiological adaptations to low‐volume, high‐intensity interval training in health and disease (2012, background): “Other studies have documented beneficial changes in various components of resting blood pressure (Rognmo et al. 2004; Schjerve et al. 2008; Whyte et al. 2010) and left ventricular morphology (Wisloff et al. 2007).”
High-Intensity Intermittent Exercise and Fat Loss (2010, background): “These have included overweight adolescents [3], older adults [6], type 1 [7] and type 2 diabetic individuals [8], paraplegics [9], intermittent claudication [10], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [11], and cardiac rehabilitation patients [12].”
Short‐term sprint interval versus traditional endurance training: similar initial adaptations in human skeletal muscle and exercise performance (2006, background): “There is also a growing appreciation of the potential for intense, interval-based training to stimulate cardiovascular and muscular adaptations in various populations, including disease states (e.g. Rognmo et al. 2004; Vogiatzis et al. 2005).”
High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2013, methodology): “21 For the ﬁ rst 4-week supervised period of Moholdt et al ’ s study, the HIIT group attended 82% of sessions and the MICT group attended 84%.”