Analysis of the Gibbs Sampler for Hierarchical Inverse Problems

By Sergios Agapiou, Johnathan M. Bardsley, Omiros Papaspiliopoulos, Andrew M. Stuart. 2013

64 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Many inverse problems arising in applications come from continuum models where the unknown parameter is a field. In practice the unknown field is discretized, resulting in a problem in ℝ^N, with an understanding that refining the discretization, that is, increasing N, will often be desirable. In the context of Bayesian inversion this situation suggests the importance of two issues: (i) defining hyperparameters in such a way that they are interpretable in the continuum limit N →∞ and so that their values may be compared between different discretization levels; and (ii) understanding the efficiency of algorithms for probing the posterior distribution as a function of large $N.$ Here we address these two issues in the context of linear inverse problems subject to additive Gaussian noise within a hierarchical modeling framework based on a Gaussian prior for the unknown field and an inverse-gamma prior for a hyperparameter, namely the amplitude of the prior variance. The structure of the model is such that the Gibbs sampler can be easily implemented for probing the posterior distribution. Subscribing to the dogma that one should think infinite-dimensionally before implementing in finite dimensions, we present function space intuition and provide rigorous theory showing that as $N$ increases, the component of the Gibbs sampler for sampling the amplitude of the prior variance becomes increasingly slower. We discuss a reparametrization of the prior variance that is robust with respect to the increase in dimension; we give numerical experiments which exhibit that our reparametrization prevents the slowing down. Our intuition on the behavior of the prior hyperparameter, with and without reparametrization, is sufficiently general to include a broad class of nonlinear inverse problems as well as other families of hyperpriors.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Control functionals for Monte Carlo integration (2014, background): “The marginalization of hyperparameters is a common problem in spatial statistics and Bayesian statistics in general (Besag and Green, 1993; Agapiou et al., 2014; Filippone and Girolami, 2014).”