Knots, links and branes at large N
By J. Labastida, Marcos Mariño, C. Vafa. 2000
248 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We consider Wilson loop observables for Chern-Simons theory at large N and its topological string dual and extend the previous checks for this duality to the case of links. We find an interesting structure involving representation/spin degeneracy of branes ending on branes which features in the large-N dual description of Chern-Simons theory. This leads to a refinement of the integer invariants for links and knots. We illustrate our results with explicit computations on the Chern-Simons side.
Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea3b08f6de84799105dde55d36185ee678e66425
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geometry and Topology
In Mathematical Physics
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Citations in the corpus
- Disk Instantons, Mirror Symmetry and the Duality Web (2001, methodology): “To see how this works it is simplest to consider the case where the D-brane topological amplitudes were computed using the observables of Chern-Simons theory [4][27][26].”
- All Loop Topological String Amplitudes from Chern-Simons Theory (2002, methodology): “Various aspects of the duality were studied in [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] from different points of view.”
- Knot Invariants from Four-Dimensional Gauge Theory (2011, background): “See [5]-[13] for a sampling of additional developments.”
- Khovanov-Rozansky Homology and Topological Strings (2004, methodology): “reformulated in terms of integers N ,Q,s which capture the spectrum of BPS states in the string Hilbert space(1) [7,8]: PN (q) = 1 q − q−1 ∑”
- Three-Dimensional Quantum Gravity, Chern-Simons Theory, and the A-Polynomial (2003, background): “11 A similar situation occurs in a different, though possibly not unrelated context in string theory [58].”
- The Superpolynomial for Knot Homologies (2005, background): “∗(Mg,Q). On the other hand, the invariants χ(Mg,Q), which in the physics literature are called “integer BPS invariants”, contain the in formation about all-genus open GromovWitten invariants of (X,LK)[25, 18]. The relation between the open Gromov-Witten invariants and the integer BPS invariants is v”
- R-Twisting and 4d/2d Correspondences (2010, background): “However, it has been argued [23, 24] that these contributions actually do admit a simple structure.”
- Torus Knots and Mirror Symmetry (2011, background): “As explained in [33], this can be evaluated by using the fact that the torus knot operators provide a representation of the fusion rules of the affine Lie algebra [31]; therefore, we can write W ) R1,.”
- Worldsheet derivation of a large N duality (2002, background): “Many checks have been performed for this conjectured duality including highly nontrivial tests involving Wilson loop operators to all order in the gauge coupling constant [8,9,10,11].”
- BPS spectra and 3-manifold invariants (2017, background): “to M5-branes in (2.13). Therefore, the sl(N) homology of M 3 = L K gets related to the bottom row of -colored HOMFLY-PT homology of K, where is a partition with Nrows (or Ncolumns). Moreover, as in [15,57], we need to relate the \partition basis" (natural on the LHS of (2.73)) to the \holonomy ”
- Mirror symmetry, D-branes and counting holomorphic discs (2000, methodology): “Using the large N duality conjecture [12] there have been some cases where one can compute certain corrections involving holomorphic maps from Riemann surfaces with boundaries to target space geometry [6][13][14].”
- Partition functions of holographic minimal models (2011, methodology): “2) is similar to the Ooguri-Vafa operator [33] (see also [34, 35, 36]) that arises in the topological string computation of knot invariants.”
- The Topological Vertex (2003, background): “Notice that the BPS degeneracies N(R1,···,RL),g,Q in the representation basis are more fundamental than the degeneracies in the winding number basis, as emphasized in [34].”