Crime Measures and the Spatial Analysis of Criminal Activity
By Martin A. Andresen. 2006
259 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea360fb7cb4fc3ff6132c8d7ff3296e60bd8cc0e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Global and Planetary Change
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jerry H. Ratcliffe
- Eric S. Mccord
- Wim Bernasco
- Lieven J. R. Pauwels
- Frank M. Weerman
- G. Bruinsma
- Martin A. Andresen
- Shane D. Johnson
Citations in the corpus
- Modeling Micro-Level Crime Location Choice: Application of the Discrete Choice Framework to Crime at Places (2010, unknown): “and criminal justice issues (Andresen 2006; Baller et al. 2001; Deane et al. 2008; Kubrin 2003; Mears and Bhati 2006; Morenoff et al. 2001), they have thus far not been used in applications of the discrete choice framework to crime location choice.”
- Social Disorganization, Social Capital, Collective Efficacy and the Spatial Distribution of Crime and Offenders An Empirical Test of Six Neighbourhood Models for a Dutch City (2013, background): “A spatial error regression model (Anselin 1988; 2003) is able to capture autocorrelated error terms and produce unbiased estimates and standard errors (for recent applications to neighbourhood crime rates, see Andresen 2006; Deane et al.”
- Crime Mapping: Spatial and Temporal Challenges (2009, methodology): “ Andresen (2006) addressed this denominator dilemma in Vancouver, BC with an imaginative approach to vehicle theft, burglary and violent crime using both residential and ambient populations as denominators, the latter providing daily estimates of a population in a spatial unit and calculated from t”
- A Micro-Spatial Analysis of the Demographic and Criminogenic Environment of Drug Markets in Philadelphia (2007, background): “Social disorganisation and routine activities are the two dominant theories used to explain the spatial distribution of crime in urban environments (Andresen, 2006).”