Information Systems in Treaty Regimes

By Xinyuan Dai. 2002

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea2d37ec324caa221224f678d9504a71bde6e005

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Jane Vaynman
2. A. Coe
3. Jason Seawright
4. David Collier
5. Jody LaPorte
6. Xinyuan Dai
7. C. Michael Hall

Citations in the corpus

• Typologies: Forming Concepts and Creating Categorical Variables (2008, background): “However, some well‐known typologies do not meet the standard of mutually exclusive categories. For example, Hirschman's (1970) “exit, voice, and loyalty” has provided a framework for conceptualizing the response to decline in different kinds of organizations.”
• Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism (2005, background): “…leverage and the informational status of competing domestic constituencies+ To illustrate how the domestic 16+ Simmons 2000+ 17+ Martin 2000+ 18+ Dai 2002b+ constituency mechanism works empirically, I take another look at the LRTAP Convention+ Responding to acid rain that typically travels…”
• Why Arms Control Is So Rare (2019, background): “Instead, it focuses on whether these agreements have escape or withdrawal provisions (Koremenos 2001), their level of legalization (Kreps 2016), and the centralization of negotiation (Verdier 2008), monitoring (Dai 2002, 2007), and enforcement (Coe and Vaynman 2015).”