Identifying the Effects of SNAP (Food Stamps) on Child Health Outcomes When Participation Is Endogenous and Misreported

331 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Expenditure Response to Increases in In-Kind Transfers: Evidence from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (2015, background): “A series of articles, notably Gundersen and Kreider (2008) and Kreider et al. (2012), make clear that, in the presence of substantial reporting error about participation, drawing definitive conclusions about the effects of SNAP can be challenging.”
On the estimation of treatment effects with endogenous misreporting (2016, background): “Kreider et al. (2012) is the most closely related to our work, in the sense that they allow for both treatment endogeneity and endogenous measurement error in the case of binary treatment as we do in this paper.”
Partial Identification Methods for Evaluating Food Assistance Programs: A Case Study of the Causal Impact of SNAP on Food Insecurity (2017, neutral): “This finding is comparable to the 0:089 upper bound estimated in Kreider et al. (2012) using NHANES data.30 Qualitatively similar results are found across a variety of different subgroups of income-eligible households with children.”
The Effect of Safety-Net Programs on Food Insecurity (2016, neutral): “These include Gundersen and Oliveira (2001); Gundersen and Kreider (2008); Nord and Golla (2009); Ratcliffe, McKernan, and Zhang (2011); Mykerezi and Mills (2010); Nord and Prell (2011); and Kreider et al. (2012).”