ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF APHID-ANT INTERACTIONS

By B. Stadler, A. F. G. Dixon. 2005

425 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea1b5fd7aabe3be9b4cbc470db0c250dad9123fd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. K. Del‐Claro
2. H. Torezan-Silingardi
3. D. Lange
4. A. A. Vilela
5. R. Fagundes
6. V. Rico‐Gray
7. A. Aguirre

In Genetics

1. K. Del‐Claro
2. H. Torezan-Silingardi
3. D. Lange
4. A. A. Vilela
5. R. Fagundes
6. V. Rico‐Gray

In Insect Science

1. H. Torezan-Silingardi
2. D. Lange
3. V. Rico‐Gray
4. K. Del‐Claro
5. A. A. Vilela
6. A. Aguirre

Citations in the corpus

• Loss and gains in ant–plant interactions mediated by extrafloral nectar: fidelity, cheats, and lies (2016, background): “Ants can control the amount of excreted honeydew by touching the hemipterans with its antennas, what eventually strengthens the mutualistic interaction (Del-Claro and Oliveira 1996; Stadler and Dixon 2005).”
• Biology and ecology of the Flavescence dorée vector Scaphoideus titanus: a review (2014, neutral): “This bug does not feed on S. titanus but can stimulate its honeydew production through contact between its antennae and the abdomen of the leafhopper when feeding on the liquid (Carle 1965), as is the case in aphid – ant interactions (Stadler and Dixon 2005).”