Indirect sulphate aerosol forcing in a climate model with an interactive sulphur cycle

By Andrew S. Jones, D. Roberts, Margaret J. Woodage, Colin Johnson. 2001

259 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea13c975a0a6f8d34cb6c532bbef3b997368e594

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. C. Hoose
2. Andrew Gettelman
3. R. Wood
4. Ulrike Lohmann
5. J. Kristjánsson
6. I. Boutle
7. T. Andrews
8. Minghuai Wang

In Global and Planetary Change

1. C. Hoose
2. Andrew Gettelman
3. R. Wood
4. Ulrike Lohmann
5. J. Kristjánsson
6. I. Boutle
7. T. Andrews
8. Minghuai Wang

Citations in the corpus

• Observations of the eruption of the Sarychev volcano and simulations using the HadGEM2 climate model. (2010, background): “The primary rate ‐ determining step for conversion of SO 2 to sulfate aerosol in the stratosphere is via gaseous reactions with the hydroxyl radical, which is a function of temperature [ Jones et al. , 2001].”
• Constraining cloud droplet number concentration in GCMs suppresses the aerosol indirect effect (2009, methodology): “In the Hadley Center climate model [Jones et al., 2001], the lower bound is 35 cm 3 over ice-free land and 5 cm 3 elsewhere.”
• Improved Aerosol Processes and Effective Radiative Forcing in HadGEM3 and UKESM1 (2018, background): “Increasing Nd can impact the cloud droplet effective radius and therefore cloud albedo (ACI𝛼 ; Jones et al., 2001).”
• Strong carbon cycle feedbacks in a climate model with interactive CO2 and sulphate aerosols (2003, background): “The second indirect sulphate effect (the ‘‘lifetime effect’’) has been estimated to be significantly smaller [Jones et al., 2001a], and is excluded for simplicity.”
• Global indirect aerosol effects: a review (2004, unknown): “…Hemisphere (NH, SH) and the ratio SH/NH of anthropogenic sulfate aerosols (red bars) from Rotstayn and Pen-ner (2001), Rotstayn and Liu (2003) and Jones et al. (2001), of anthropogenic sulfate and organic carbon (blue bars) from Menon et al. (2002a); Quaas et al. (2004), of anthropogenic sulfate…”
• Drizzle in Stratiform Boundary Layer Clouds. Part II: Microphysical Aspects. (2005, methodology): “This is a fairly common choice when applying this scheme in numerical models (e.g. Jones et al., 2001).”
• Total aerosol effect: radiative forcing or radiative flux perturbation? (2009, background): “1 Cloud albedo and cloud lifetime effect Lohmann and Feichter(1997), Rotstayn(1999), Lohmann et al. (2000), Jones et al.(2001), Williams et al. (2001), Ghan et al.(2001), Lohmann and Lesins(2002), Menon et al. (2002), Kristjánsson(2002), Peng and Lohmann(2003), Kristjánsson et al.(2005), Ming et…”
• Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering (2015, methodology): “The sulfate aerosol scheme divides sulfate aerosol into three modes: Aitken, accumulation, and dissolvedmodes [Jones et al., 2001; Bellouin et al., 2007].”
• Aerosol indirect effects – general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data (2009, unknown): “33 d (Rasch and Kristjansson, 1998; Jones et al., 2001).”
• Pelagic functional group modeling: Progress, challenges and prospects (2006, unknown): “By changing the background levels of CCN, natural DMS emissions serve to alter the magnitude of direct and indirect anthropogenic sulfate emission forcing in polluted air masses (e.g. Jones et al., 2001).”
• Aerosol indirect forcing in a global model with particle nucleation (2008, background): “Some models include only stratiform clouds (e.g., Suzuki et al., 2004), but other studies include both stratiform and convective clouds (e.g., Jones et al., 2001).”