Globalization and the changing architecture of the state: the regulatory state and the politics of negative co-ordination

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Research University in Transition: The Emerging Global Model (2008, background): “Services are decentralized and often privatized, relying more on market mechanisms and self-regulation than direct government involvement (Jayasurya, 2001).”
Rising powers and state transformation: The case of China (2016, background): “Many agencies, regulatory bodies and subnational units have developed their own international policies and relationships, breaking the monopoly of foreign and defence ministries (Jayasuriya, 2001).”
Globalization and educational restructuring: University merging and changing governance in China (2005, background): “Instead, they believe nation states still retain the ultimate claim of legal legitimacy within their territories even though they have to respond to external pressures generated by international laws and authorities (Jayasuriya, 2001; Pempel 1998).”
The Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism in Latin America: Sectoral and National Channels in the Making of a New Order (2005, background): “Governance through autonomous regulatory authorities is no longer a peculiarity of the American administrative state but a central feature of reforms in Europe (Majone 1994, 1997; Gilardi 2005 [this volume]), East Asia (Jayasuriya 2001), and developing countries (Cook et al. 2004).”