Emotion and psychopathology: Bridging affective and clinical science.

By Jonathan Rottenberg, Sheri L. Johnson. 2007

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The psychometric assessment of alexithymia: Development and validation of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (2018, result): “…given that we did not use a clinical sample, these results are consistent with contemporary models of psychopathology (e.g., Ellard et al., 2010; Rottenberg & Johnson, 2007; Taylor et al., 1999), which consider alexithymia as a key risk factor for the development of psychiatric symptomatology.”
Can Feeling Too Good Be Bad? (2011, background): “Research supporting this includes the finding that those at risk for and diagnosed with BD show an increased ability to recognize positive facial cues and positive words (for review, see Johnson et al., 2007 ).”
A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorder. (2008, background): “Emotion context insensitivity (ECI), the third view, holds that depressed individuals will exhibit reduced reactivity to all emotion cues, regardless of valence (Rottenberg, 2005, 2007).”
Measuring emotion regulation ability across negative and positive emotions: The Perth Emotion Regulation Competency Inventory (PERCI) (2018, background): “…to alter the trajectory of their emotions and such attempts constitute emotion regulation (Gross, 2014; John & Eng, 2014; Preece et al., 2017; Rottenberg & Johnson, 2007).24 In this paper, we document our development of a new self-report measure of emotion regulation, the Perth Emotion…”