Jet substructure at the Large Hadron Collider

By R. Kogler, Benjamin Nachman, A. Schmidt, L. Asquith, M. Campanelli, C. Delitzsch, Philip C. Harris, A. Hinzmann, Deepak Kar, C. McLean and 6 more. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2018

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We thank CERN and the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, the participants and organizers of the Boost Workshops held in Zurich12 2016 and Buffalo13 2017 for discussions and input,and Jon Butterworth for suggesting this jet substructure reviewarticle. We also thank Andrew Larkoski and Ian Moult for thecollaboration on the theoretical review. R. K., B. N., and A. S.are the editors for this review. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science under ContractNo. DE-AC02-05CH11231. We acknowledge the support of the German Ministry for Education and Science (BMBF), the German Research Foundation (DFG), and the European Research Council (ERC).

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9ef1d446bc6a70436881567f85bc8eaa9b4340c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Citations in the corpus

Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence (2023, unknown): “Similarly, using other representations of jet substructures in isolation cannot give a holistic and integrated systems view of the complex system 219 .”
Collider physics at the precision frontier (2020, background): “ the dominant Higgs decay mode, however due to the large QCD backgrounds, experimental analyses in the past mostly have focused on associated (VH) production modes. Due to jet-substructure techniques [117], it recently became possible to measure gg!H!bbin the boosted regime [118, 119]. The QCD corre”