Testing E-OBS European high-resolution gridded data set of daily precipitation and surface temperature

By N. Hofstra, M. Haylock, M. New, P. Jones. 2009

345 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Climate change multi‐model projections for temperature extremes in Portugal (2014, background): “Furthermore, some small discrepancies may be rather attributed to limitations inherent to the EOBS dataset itself than to the ensemble (Hofstra et al., 2009).”
Evaluation of the convection‐resolving regional climate modeling approach in decade‐long simulations (2014, background): “The comparison of the EOBS data set with high-resolution observations shows good spatial correlation, although mean absolute errors are significant, on the order of 0.5◦C for temperature and may exceed 100% at some grid points for precipitation [Hofstra et al., 2009].”
Which rainfall score is more informative about the performance in river discharge simulation? A comprehensive assessment on 1318 basins over Europe (2020, background): “For some regions, the station density is sufficiently low enough to expect a strong tendency for interpolated daily rainfall and temperature values to be underestimated with respect to the “true” area average of stations (Hofstra et al., 2009, 2010; Kyselý and Plavcová, 2010).”