International Trade and Developing Countries: Bargaining Coalitions in GATT and WTO

By A. Narlikar. 2003

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9dff6204cf37d568a109b1f8ed38714b91fb8b1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

1. Shamel Azmeh
2. Christopher Foster
3. Jaime Echávarri

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Shamel Azmeh
2. Christopher Foster
3. Jaime Echávarri

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Shamel Azmeh
2. Christopher Foster

Citations in the corpus

• Different paths to power: The rise of Brazil, India and China at the World Trade Organization (2014, unknown): “However, as Amrita Narlikar (2003) has documented, these early coalitions were largely ineffective, hampered by the absence of a strong issue-specific focus, a lack of technical capacity, and an inability to maintain unity and resist collapse in the face of pressures from the dominant powers.”
• The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial: Developing Countries and their Evolving Coalitions in the WTO (2004, unknown): “35 On a sceptical analysis of the actual victories and influence of the Cairns Group, see Narlikar (2003).”
• The International Trade Regime and the Quest for Free Digital Trade (2019, background): “This seems to confirm institutional perspectives on international organizations that highlight issues such as institutional design and coalition building as important in the way such institutions could mitigate power differences (Narlikar 2003; Wilkinson 2013).”