Remote prey detection in Oithona similis: hydromechanical versus chemical cues
By C. Svensen, T. Kiørboe. 2000
190 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9cd3cef069f5a9ef541ca31c8d56d5f706ac795
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Environmental Chemistry
In Oceanography
- T. Kiørboe
- D. Sarno
- H. Jakobsen
- Adriana Zingone
- Marina Montresor
- Uffe Høgsbro Thygesen
- U. Christaki
- D. Vaqué
Citations in the corpus
- Escape response of planktonic protists to fluid mechanical signals (2001, methodology): “The reaction distance, defined as the distance from the prey to a given point in the ambient water where it can be perceived by the predator, can be estimated using the ‘di-pole’ model given in Svensen & Kiørboe (2000).”
- Plankton in the open Mediterranean Sea: a review (2009, background): “Oithonids stand motionless for most of the time perceiving hydromechanical signals from moving prey with their rich array of long setae (Paffenḧofer, 1998; Svensen and Kiørboe, 2000; Paffenḧofer and Mazzocchi, 2002).”
- Seasonal patterns in plankton communities in a pluriannual time series at a coastal Mediterranean site (Gulf of Naples): an attempt to discern recurrences and trends (2004, background): “…rates and reduced daily rations (Mazzocchi and Paffenhöfer, 1998), while Oithona and Oncaea are reported to preferentially feed on moving preys (Uchima and Hirano, 1988; Svensen and Kiørboe, 2000) and sinking aggregates (Alldredge, 1972; Lampitt et al., 1993; Ohtsuka et al., 1996), respectively.”
- Fluid motion and solute distribution around sinking aggregates. II. Implications for remote detection by colonizing zooplankters (2001, background): “Attack responses appear to be elicited at signal strengths closer to the neurophysiological limit, e.g., 40 µm s–1 in Oithona similis, a copepod with particularly long setae (Svensen & Kiørboe 2000), and about an order of magnitude higher in the predatory copepod Centropages typicus (Titelman 2001).”