Unsupervised training of an HMM-based self-organizing unit recognizer with applications to topic classification and keyword discovery
By Man-Hung Siu, Herbert Gish, Arthur Chan, William Belfield, S. Lowe. 2014
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Information Extraction, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- James R. Glass
- Emmanuel Dupoux
- Wei-Ning Hsu
- Herman Kamper
- David F. Harwath
- Sharon Goldwater
- Aren Jansen
- Karen Livescu
In Natural Language Processing
- James R. Glass
- Herman Kamper
- Sharon Goldwater
- Aren Jansen
- Wei-Ning Hsu
- Yonatan Belinkov
- Dong Yu
- David F. Harwath
In Information Extraction
In Signal Processing
- James R. Glass
- Wei-Ning Hsu
- David F. Harwath
- Emmanuel Dupoux
- Herman Kamper
- Aren Jansen
- Thomas Schatz
- Karen Livescu
Citations in the corpus
- Learning Hierarchical Discrete Linguistic Units from Visually-Grounded Speech (2019, background): “A different line of work employs probabilistic graphical models to jointly segment and cluster the speech signal (Varadarajan et al., 2008; Zhang & Glass, 2009; Gish et al., 2009; Lee & Glass, 2012; Siu et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2015; Ondel et al., 2016; Kamper et al., 2016; 2017a).”
- A segmental framework for fully-unsupervised large-vocabulary speech recognition (2016, methodology): “…(GMMs) to produce frame-level posteriorgrams [9,10], us-ing unsupervised hidden Markov models (HMMs) to obtain discrete categorical output in terms of discovered subword units [2,11,12], and using unsupervised neural networks (NNs) to obtain frame-level continuous vector representations [13–15].”
- An empirical evaluation of zero resource acoustic unit discovery (2017, background): “Finally, previous work like [14, 15] presented the success of using unit- or word-level acoustic patterns discovered from fully unsupervised setting to provide competitive performance in spoken document topical classification and clustering, we also explicitly measure our AUD utility of learning doc”
- The zero resource speech challenge 2015 (2015, result): “These two levels have already been investigated in previous work (see [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], and [8, 9, 10, 11], respectively), but the performance of the different systems has not yet been compared using common evaluation metrics and data sets.”
- Unsupervised Speech Recognition via Segmental Empirical Output Distribution Matching (2018, methodology): “Another line of research uses a simpler segmentation method as an initialization, and jointly trains the segmenting and acoustic models for phonemes or words (Kamper et al., 2015; Glass, 2003; Siu et al., 2014; Lee and Glass, 2012).”
- Discovering linguistic structures in speech: models and applications (2014, background): “However, it did not receive significant attention again until the mid to late 2000’s, when the authors of [50, 169] began investigating the use of self-”
- Unsupervised word discovery from speech using automatic segmentation into syllable-like units (2015, result): “In contrast to earlier work, which has used dynamic time-warping (DTW) [3-6], high-order Markov-approximations [7], HMMs [8], or spectrotemporal parametric models [9] for finding recurring fragments of audio, the present work attempts to bootstrap the learning process with the help via the rhythmic ”
- Feature optimized DPGMM clustering for unsupervised subword modeling: A contribution to zerospeech 2017 (2017, methodology): “Transformation estimation is done by running an out-of-thebox acoustic model training pipeline, similar to [18].”
- Vector-quantized neural networks for acoustic unit discovery in the ZeroSpeech 2020 challenge (2020, methodology): “Early approaches to acoustic unit discovery typically combined clustering methods with hidden Markov models [15–19].”