The Genuine Progress Indicator 2006
By J. Talberth, C. Cobb, N. Slattery. 2007
131 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9a3e2a9e86e58186a6b8aa20c4bd087de75015d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Building a Sustainable and Desirable Economy-in-Society-in-Nature (2013, background): “Comparing GDP and GPI for the United States, shows that, while GDP has steadily increased since 1950, with the occasional dip or recession, GPI peaked in about 1975 and has been fl at or gradually decreasing ever since (Talberth et al. 2007).”
- Economic Growth Quality, Environmental Sustainability, and Social Welfare in China - Provincial Assessment Based on Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) (2019, methodology): “Furthermore, after decades' modification, both the ISEW's and GPI's calculation approach, precision, and comprehensiveness of components have all been improved substantially (Clifford Cobb et al., 1995, 2001; Talberth et al., 2007).”
- Economic Growth and Sustainable Development in Indonesia: An Assessment (2018, background): “Regardless of the GDP indicator’s traditional role in measuring a country’s economic performance, it does not account for the social and environmental issues that may oppose financial benefits (Talberth, Cobb, and Slattery 2007).”