The CME-flare relationship: Are there really two types of CMEs?

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Solar flares, coronal mass ejections and solar energetic particle event characteristics (2016, methodology): “Temporal criterion: For each CME we used the linear backextrapolation of its trajectory to the surface of the Sun in order to roughly estimate the lift-off time t0 (Vršnak et al. 2005).”
Acceleration in Fast Halo CMEs and Synchronized Flare HXR Bursts (2008, unknown): “In statistical studies the CME velocity was found to be related with the SXR peak flux (e.g., Moon et al. 2002; Burkepile et al. 2004; Vršnak et al. 2005).”
A Statistical Study of Main and Residual Accelerations of Coronal Mass Ejections (2006, background): “Vršnak et al. (2005) found that flare-associated CMEs and nonflare CMEs showed quite similar characteristics in the LASCO C2 and C3 fields of view, contradicting the concept of two types.”
On the Magnetic Flux Budget in Low-Corona Magnetic Reconnection and Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections (2007, background): “…between flares and fast CMEs is much closer than previously thought (Zhang et al. 2001; Gallagher et al. 2003; Cheng et al. 2003;Wang et al. 2003; Vrsnak et al. 2005), and the latest studies further illustrate a temporal correlation and magnitude scaling relationship between early-stage CME…”