Automation spectrum, inner / outer compatibility and other potentially useful human factors concepts for assistance and automation
By F. Flemisch, Anna Schieben, J. Kelsch, Christian Löper. 2008
147 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e99fdb9ac830f07086467689d3f6524532c57fa1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- J. D. de Winter
- Riender Happee
- Zhenji Lu
- Miltos Kyriakidis
- Christopher D. D. Cabrall
- Natasha Merat
- Oliver M. J. Carsten
- A. Jamson
Citations in the corpus
- Haptic shared control: smoothly shifting control authority? (2012, background): “But this may not be the most natural way of shifting or communicating the LoA (Flemisch et al. 2008).”
- Human factors of transitions in automated driving: A general framework and literature survey (2016, background): “Flemisch et al. (2008) included all possible control transitions in a spectrum of automation.”
- Highly Automated Driving, Secondary Task Performance, and Driver State (2012, background): “Conclusion: Highly automated driving did not have a deleterious effect on driver performance, when attention was not diverted to the distracting secondary task.”
- Presenting system uncertainty in automotive UIs for supporting trust calibration in autonomous driving (2013, background): “[11], there are many questions that need to be investigated regarding the proper balance between the driver and the automated systems, especial about the authority of the assistance and automated systems in emergency situations.”