Political determinants of international currencies: What future for the US dollar?

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Understanding the 2007–2008 Global Financial Crisis: Lessons for Scholars of International Political Economy (2011, background): “…to official reserve accumulation (as explained by geopolitical, Bretton Woods II, self-insurance, and entrapment interpretations), there were also important costs that IPE scholars highlighted in the lead-up to the crisis (Dieter 2007, Helleiner 2008, Kirshner 2008; see also Eichengreen 2006).”
Subordinated Financial Integration and Financialisation in Emerging Capitalist Economies: The Brazilian Experience (2018, background): “Neutral currencies are economically attractive, but do not have the means to become top currencies (Strange, 1971, Helleiner 2008, Otero-Iglesias and Steinberg 2013).11 The IPE literature shows the ‘exorbitant economic privilege’ that accompanies a currency’s position on the top of the hierarchy.”
This Time It's Real: The End of Unipolarity and the Pax Americana (2012, background): “Although doubts about the dollar’s long-term health predated the Great Recession, the events of 2007–2009 have amplified them in two key respects (Helleiner 2008; Kirshner 2008).”
Dollar primacy and American power: What's at stake? (2008, unknown): “16 Strange (1971b); Helleiner (2006a).”
Black Swans, Lame Ducks, and the mystery of IPE's missing macroeconomy (2017, background): “For an overview, see, for example, Eichengreen (2006), Kirshner (2008), Helleiner (2008) and Helleiner and Kirshner (2009).”