Indigenous Knowledge and Intellectual Property: A Sustainability Agenda

By Dora Marinova, Margaret Raven. 2006

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The paper argues that the current ways of protecting intellectual property are limited in their scope for recognizing indigenous rights to indigenous knowledge. Indigenous knowledge is often defined as being holistic and collectively owned, and an appropriate protection should allow for maintaining the cultural and physical environment that has generated it. Copyright 2006 The Authors Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e98e16f63727c25eb7c1c80a0f9572c6e114234d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. A. Rodríguez‐Pose
2. J. Foreman-Peck
3. Fulvio Castellacci

In Global and Planetary Change

1. A. Rodríguez‐Pose
2. J. Foreman-Peck
3. Fulvio Castellacci
4. R. Crescenzi

In Strategy and Management

1. A. Rodríguez‐Pose
2. J. Foreman-Peck
3. M. Storper
4. Fulvio Castellacci
5. Q. Li
6. R. Crescenzi
7. C. Lie
8. J. Love

Citations in the corpus

• BEYOND THE HYPE: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY/KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY (2006, unknown): “Bourdieu (1986) has extended understanding of capital to include alongside economic capital, cultural capital, and subsequently social capital has also been distinguished (Cunningham, 2005; Pillay, 2005; Marinova and Raven, 2006).”
• Do the effects of R&D tax credits vary across industries? A meta-regression analysis (2015, background): “Besides, the additional R&D carried out in industry j will also lead to economic and productivity gains in other industries of the economy through a set of inter-industry knowledge spillover effects (Wieser, 2005).”
• Effectiveness and efficiency of SME innovation policy (2013, background): “As a consequence of such market failures, social returns to R&D are estimated to be high and to exceed private returns by a wide margin (Griffith et al 2001; HM Treasury et al 2004; Wieser 2005).”
• Technological regimes and sectoral differences in productivity growth (2007, background): “Wieser (2005) presents a very comprehensive survey of this type of research focused on data, empirical methods and econometric results.”
• Innovation and the competitiveness of industries: comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches (2008, methodology): “the major econometric works; Los and Verspagen [19] review the various methodologies used in different strands of empirical analysis; David et al. [20] focus on the relationships between private and public RD finally, Bartelsman and Doms [21] and Wieser [ 22 ] review the large set of micro-level stu”
• Is a higher rate of R&D tax credit a panacea for low levels of R&D in disadvantaged regions? (2009, background): “Wieser (2005) has recently provided an extensive review of this literature.”
• The territorial dynamics of innovation: a Europe-United States Comparative Analysis (2007, background): “…the composition and recomposition of clusters and agglomerations may affect the nature and level of innovation through the types of knowledge they 6 Zimmermann (2005) points out that the EU shows “a split labour market that is characterized by high leve s of unemployment for low-skilled people and…”