COGNITIVE RESPONSES TO IDEALIZED MEDIA IMAGES OF WOMEN: THE RELATIONSHIP OF SOCIAL COMPARISON AND CRITICAL PROCESSING TO BODY IMAGE DISTURBANCE IN COLLEGE WOMEN

By Renee Engeln-Maddox. 2005

218 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e984f4cd01e8d99da0f03c90827d484b7d639dca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. N. Sabik
2. Veya Seekis
3. Amanda L. Duffy
4. Graham Bradley
5. Lenny R. Vartanian
6. Tracy Lynn Tylka
7. Robin L. Nabi
8. Taryn A. Myers

In Gender Studies

1. Tracy Lynn Tylka
2. N. Sabik
3. Robin L. Nabi
4. Lenny R. Vartanian
5. Taryn A. Myers
6. J. Crowther
7. Graham Bradley
8. Dawn M. Szymanski

In Marketing

1. N. Sabik
2. Veya Seekis
3. Amanda L. Duffy
4. Graham Bradley
5. Robin L. Nabi
6. Lenny R. Vartanian
7. Taryn A. Myers
8. J. Crowther

Citations in the corpus

• Social comparison as a predictor of body dissatisfaction: A meta-analytic review. (2009, background): “Consistent with theory and research (e.g., Bessenoff, 2006; Engeln-Maddox, 2005; Halliwell & Harvey, 2006; Shaw & Waller, 1995; Tantleff-Dunn & Gokee, 2002), social comparison will be positively related to body dissatisfaction.”
• Cosmetic Surgery Makeover Programs and Intentions to Undergo Cosmetic Enhancements: A Consideration of Three Models of Media Effects. (2009, background): “…the general media (Jones, 2001; Morrison, Kalin, & Morrison, 2004), television programming and commercials (Botta, 1999; Cattarin, Thompson, Thomas, & Williams, 2000; Tiggemann & Slater, 2004), and magazine ads (Engelin-Maddox, 2005; Martin & Kennedy, 1993; Richins, 1991; Tiggemann & McGill, 2004).”
• Integrating Social Comparison Theory and Self-Esteem within Objectification Theory to Predict Women’s Disordered Eating (2010, background): “U.S. college women who made upward social comparisons with advertisements featuring attractive models reported greater body dissatisfaction ( Engeln-Maddox 2005 ).”
• Appearance-Related Social Networking Sites and Body Image in Young Women: Testing an Objectification-Social Comparison Model (2020, background): “…to similar others, Myers and Crowther (2009) argue that women compare themselves to unrealistic, thin media images of women just as frequently as they compare themselves to similar peers (Engeln- Maddox, 2005), and do so despite detrimental consequences to their body image (Strahan et al., 2006).”
• Inspired by Hope, Motivated by Envy: Comparing the Effects of Discrete Emotions in the Process of Social Comparison to Media Figures (2014, unknown): “…programming and commercials (Agliata & Tantleff-Dunn, 2004; Botta, 1999; Cattarin, Thompson, Thomas, & Williams, 2000; Tiggemann & Slater, 2004), and magazine ads (Engeln-Maddox, 2005; Hawkins, Richards, Granley, & Stein, 2004; Martin & Kennedy, 1993; Richins, 1991; Tiggemann & McGill, 2004).”
• When the Body Defines the Self: Self-Concept Clarity, Internalization, and Body Image (2009, background): “The majority of studies find no association between BMI and the degree of internalization of societal standards of attractiveness (Engeln-Maddox, 2005; Fingeret & Gleaves, 2004; Low et al., 2003; Matz, Foster, Faith, & Wadden, 2002; Stice, Mazotti, Krebs, & Martin, 1998; Stice, Shaw, & Nemeroff, 199”