Microstructure of martensite : why it forms and how it gives rise to the shape-memory effect

By Kaushik Bhattacharya. 2003

1,016 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e983a73318b893ace6dd499fb4742beff687cbb3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

Citations in the corpus

Transformation-induced plasticity during pseudoelastic deformation in Ni–Ti microcrystals (2009, methodology): “0427 [8].”
Experimental study on rate dependence of macroscopic domain and stress hysteresis in NiTi shape memory alloy strips (2010, background): “The mechanical behaviour of shape memory alloys (SMAs) are governed by solid-solid phase transition processes between different crystal structures [1–3].”
On the Theory of Relaxation in Nonlinear Elasticity with Constraints on the Determinant (2014, background): “3 Examples We first consider the two-well problem in two dimensions, a classical model for microstructure in martensite [6, 7, 12, 5].”
Shape-Memory Alloys Handbook (2013, methodology): “Illustration of the condition of kinematic compatibility [BHA 03]”
A robust model of pseudoelasticity in shape memory alloys (2013, neutral): “Shape memory alloys (SMA) exhibit well-known spectacular effects (shape recovery, pseudoelasticity) associated with reversible martensitic phase transformation [1, 2].”
Atomistic to continuum limits for computational materials science (2007, background): “We refer for instance to [8, 11, 12, 18, 19, 57, 61, 89, 109, 115, 128] and the references therein, without being exhaustive.”
Explicit finite element implementation of an improved three dimensional constitutive model for shape memory alloys (2013, background): “…modern day development of three-dimensional continuum-scale shape memory alloy (SMA) constitutive models (e.g., [2–5]), largely because it was the first model at this scale to phenomenologically consider the ability of a martensite microstructure to reorient during non-proportional loading events.”
Stress-induced martensitic phase transformation in thin sheets of Nitinol (2007, background): “The deformation is recovered in these materials because it is accommodated by martensitic phase transformation and transformation twinning/detwinning rather than by crystallographic slip [1,2].”