Real-time remote monitoring of water quality: a review of current applications, and advancements in sensor, telemetry, and computing technologies

By H. Glasgow, J. Burkholder, R. Reed, A. Lewitus, J. E. Kleinman. 2004

449 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Forecasting: theory and practice (2020, background): “148 monitoring and early warning systems (Storey et al., 2011), predicting algal bloom outbreaks leading to fish kill events and potential human health impacts, forecasting water level and currents (Archer et al., 2003; Glasgow et al., 2004).”
Eutrophication and Harmful Algal Blooms: A Scientific Consensus (2008, background): “In situ probes with telemetry for various key variables such as temperature, salinity, chlorophyll, turbidity, dissolved oxygen and pHs are also providing near-real time data for management applications (Glasgow et al., 2004; Springer et al., 2005).”
Advancing the Science and Practice of Fish Kill Investigations (2011, background): “…al.) of where fish kills have been monitored or studied using a large-scale ecological or environmental observatory, this technology has been recognized as a critical need for early warning systems and rapid response to harmful algal bloom events (Glasgow et al., 2004) which can promote fish kills.”
Landsat continuity: Issues and opportunities for land cover monitoring (2008, background): “For instance, what revisit rate is required to meet: 1–5 year mapping of land cover type, annual assessment of land cover conversion and major disturbance, seasonal evaluation of transient ecosystem disturbance, monitoring crop phenology, or water quality monitoring? The majority of these aforementi”