Genetic and environmental contributions to the morphology of lake and stream stickleback: implications for gene flow and reproductive isolation
By D. Sharpe, K. Räsänen, Daniel Berner, A. Hendry. 2008
100 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e96dcc90595706d08dddec8b499db861a4e97d9f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. Bell
- P. Nosil
- A. Hendry
- W. Aguirre
- B. Matthews
- Catherine L. Peichel
- Janette Boughman
- Ole Seehausen
Citations in the corpus
- Stickleback research: the now and the next (2013, background): “Stickleback are appropriate for attempting this disentanglement because the phenotypes of populations in different ecological environments are known to be shaped by both genetic differences and plasticity (Day et al., 1994; Sharpe et al., 2008; Wund et al., 2008).”
- Contemporary evolution, allelic recycling, and adaptive radiation of the threespine stickleback (2013, background): “…of lateral plate number (Lindsey, 1962), body size (McGuigan et al., 2010), vertebral number (Swain, 1992a, 1992b), trophic morphology (Day et al., 1994; Wund et al., 2008), body shape (Sharpe et al., 2008), life-history traits (Baker et al., 2013), and male courtship behaviour (Candolin, 2009).”