Comparison of Different Approaches to Define the Applicability Domain of QSAR Models

By F. Sahigara, Kamel Mansouri, Davide Ballabio, A. Mauri, Viviana Consonni, Roberto Todeschini. Molecules, 2012

542 citations recorded by the source corpus.

One of the OECD principles for model validation requires defining the Applicability Domain (AD) for the QSAR models. This is important since the reliable predictions are generally limited to query chemicals structurally similar to the training compounds used to build the model. Therefore, characterization of interpolation space is significant in defining the AD and in this study some existing descriptor-based approaches performing this task are discussed and compared by implementing them on existing validated datasets from the literature. Algorithms adopted by different approaches allow defining the interpolation space in several ways, while defined thresholds contribute significantly to the extrapolations. For each dataset and approach implemented for this study, the comparison analysis was carried out by considering the model statistics and relative position of test set with respect to the training space.

Subfields: Analytical Chemistry, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e955330fec7945e84fe365dbf16f7aa833421ecd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Francesca Grisoni
  2. Gisbert Schneider
  3. José Jiménez-Luna
  4. Oliver Fiehn
  5. Tobias Kind
  6. I. Blaženović
  7. Jian Ji
  8. Sebastian Böcker

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Francesca Grisoni
  2. Gisbert Schneider
  3. José Jiménez-Luna
  4. Oliver Fiehn
  5. Kenneth Atz

Citations in the corpus