Institutions matter, but which ones?

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Agriculture, Diffusion and Development: Ripple Effects of the Neolithic Revolution (2008, unknown): “18. statehist has also been tested and found to be a powerful instrument in studies by Aghion and Howitt (2005) and Bardhan (2005), among others.”
Inequality, Democracy, and Institutions: A Critical Review of Recent Research (2010, unknown): “For the rich (poor) cannot commit to compensate the poor (rich) after old rules have been replaced with new ones (see Acemoglu, 2003; Bardhan, 2005a, chap.”
How does social trust lead to better governance? An attempt to separate electoral and bureaucratic mechanisms (2010, background): “Several papers in recent years have stressed the need to distinguish between different types of institutions (Acemoglu and Johnson 2005; Bardhan 2005; Munck and Verkuilen 2002).”
The ‘reversal of fortune’ thesis and the compression of history: Perspectives from African and comparative economic history (2008, background): “Higher population density, for instance, might make it harder to settle and facilitate the spread of some diseases (Bardhan, 2005: 510–511).”
The Resource Curse and its Potential Reversal (2013, background): “(2006) and Boschini et al. (2007). 19 Our main rule-based measures of institutional quality come from the Polity IV data set (Marshall & Jaggers, 2002). The Polity IV measure of democracy reflects the extent to which the three essential, interdependent elements are adhered to: (1) the presence of in”