Interactive and interpretable machine learning models for human machine collaboration
By Been Kim. 2015
103 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- Nicola De Cao
- Joelle Pineau
- Mohit Bansal
- Michael Sejr Schlichtkrull
- Ryan J. Lowe
- Ivan Titov
- Peter Henderson
- Koustuv Sinha
Citations in the corpus
- Ethical Challenges in Data-Driven Dialogue Systems (2017, background): “stems. Ethics and safety in artificial intelligence (AI) has recently gained popularity as a field due to performance gains in AI models, investigating issues like: interpretability of model decisions (Kim 2015), worst-case performance guarantees (Garcıa and Fernandez 2015), and many others. In´ the c”
- The mythos of model interpretability (2016, background): “ronment. Thus interpretations serve those objectives that we deem important but struggle to model formally. Trust: Some papers motivate interpretability by suggesting it to be prerequisite for trust (Kim, 2015; Ribeiro et al., 2016). But what is trust? Is it simply confidence that a model will perfor”
- Adversarial Risk and the Dangers of Evaluating Against Weak Attacks (2018, background): “lyzed suggests the potential for fruitful exchange of ideas (Christiano, 2016). Whileinthemodelinterpretabilitycommunity, transparency is often measured qualitatively from the perspective of a human (Kim, 2015; Krakovna and Doshi-Velez, 2016; Ross and Doshi-Velez, 2018), we note that obscurity as we”
- How Do Decisions Emerge across Layers in Neural Models? Interpretation with Differentiable Masking (2020, background): “This lack of interpretability can prevent users from trusting model predictions (Kim, 2015; Ribeiro et al., 2016), makes it hard to detect model or data deficiencies (Gururangan et al., 2018; Kaushik and Lipton, 2018) or verify that a model is fair and does not exhibit harmful biases (Sun et al.,…”
- Approximate and Exact Enumeration of Rule Models (2018, background): “The need for model interpretability is particularly strong in some practical situations, such as the following (Kim 2015; Doshi-Velez and Kim 2017).”
- Interpretable R-CNN (2017, background): “In the context of supervised learning, Lipton [49] investigated the motives for interpretability including trust [38, 62], causality [58], transferability [5] and informativeness [38], and properties of interpretable models including transparency in terms of simulatability and decomposability and po”
- Interpreting Graph Neural Networks for NLP With Differentiable Edge Masking (2020, background): “Furthermore, this opaqueness decreases user trust, impedes the discovery of harmful biases, and complicates error analysis (Kim, 2015; Ribeiro et al., 2016b; Sun et al., 2019b; Holstein et al., 2019).”
- Reasons, Values, Stakeholders: A Philosophical Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021, background): “…concretely, the development of explainable AI systems is motivated by several social and ethical reasons (see, for example, [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]): increasing societal acceptance of prediction-based decisions, establishing trust in the results of these decisions, making…”