Influence of pore size distribution on methane storage at relatively low pressure: preparation of activated carbon with optimum pore size

By D. Lozano‐Castelló, D. Cazorla-Amorós, Á. Linares-Solano, D. Quinn. 2002

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Inorganic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e924a5ba271765b74d482cd1c497e792fc2dac34

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

1. Yury Gogotsi
2. G. Yushin
3. John Chmiola
4. P. Simon
5. Volker Presser
6. M. Sevilla
7. Pierre-Louis Taberna
8. A. B. Fuertes

In Inorganic Chemistry

1. Yury Gogotsi
2. G. Yushin

In Materials Chemistry

1. Yury Gogotsi
2. G. Yushin
3. Michel W. Barsoum
4. J. Rosen
5. Husam N. Alshareef
6. B. Anasori
7. Chao Zhang
8. P. Simon

Citations in the corpus

• Titanium Carbide Derived Nanoporous Carbon for Energy-Related Applications (2006, methodology): “TiC-CDC prepared at 800C showed higher methane uptake than activated carbon (< 35 cm(3)/g) [28] and metal organic framework (IRMOF-6)(< 10 cm(3)/g) [29] at 25C and atmospheric pressure.”