Estimating and indexing feral cat population abundances using camera traps

By Andrew J. Bengsen, J. A. Butler, P. Masters. 2011

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8ff04a2e926afc27df8ed2f64d5124e60bde9b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. P. Fleming
2. G. Ballard
3. Chris R. Dickman
4. Paul D. Meek
5. B. Lazenby
6. N. Mooney
7. K. Vernes
8. Mike Letnic

In Genetics

1. P. Fleming
2. Chris R. Dickman
3. G. Ballard

Citations in the corpus

• The history of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia (2015, background): “The impacts of slow camera trap trigger speed and recovery may have affected the results of studies by Claridge et al. (2010), Meek (2010), Bengsen et al.”
• Effects of low-level culling of feral cats in open populations: a case study from the forests of southern Tasmania (2015, background): “Robley et al. (2010)were able to detect a difference in occupancy rates using remote cameras between two different habitats, and Bengsen et al. (2011) were able to measure a reduction in feral cat numbers following a culling operation in a closed population.”