Influence of combined pesticide and parasite exposure on bumblebee colony traits in the laboratory

By Aline Fauser-Misslin, Ben M. Sadd, P. Neumann, C. Sandrock. 2014

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Protecting an ecosystem service: approaches to understanding and mitigating threats to wild insect pollinators (2016, background): “…looking at interactive 360 effects are typically limited to two (or few) factors (Baron et al., 2014; Becher et al., 2013; 361 Doublet et al., 2015; Fauser-Misslin et al., 2014; Gill et al., 2012; Gonzalez-Varo et al., 2013; 362 Hoover et al., 2012; Kennedy et al., 2013; Kleijn and van Langevelde,…”
Chronic impairment of bumblebee natural foraging behaviour induced by sublethal pesticide exposure (2014, background): “…Decourtye & Delpuech 2007; Cresswell 2011; Blacqui ere et al. 2012; Gill, Ramos-Rodriguez & Raine 2012) and/or increase their susceptibility to parasites (Alaux et al. 2010; Vidau et al. 2011; Aufauvre et al. 2012; Pettis et al. 2012; Fauser-Misslin et al. 2014; but see Baron, Raine & Brown 2014).”
Superorganism resilience: eusociality and susceptibility of ecosystem service providing insects to stressors (2015, background): “bumble bee colonies exposed to neonicotinoids produced fewer gynes (future queens) [32,33] and that honey bee colonies replaced queens more frequently [29]; however, mechanisms responsible for these observations have not yet been identified.”