Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis.

By S. Bipat, A. Glas, F. Slors, Aeilko H. Zwinderman, Patrick M. M. Bossuyt, J. Stoker. Radiology, 2004

1,028 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8ef4646e3f5117cd78fa964f21ec44cc2cdb5c6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Oncology

1. Fortunato Ciardiello

Citations in the corpus

• Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting (2017, background): “In these cases patients should be referred for (additional) endorectal ultrasound (EUS), given its superior diagnostic performance for differentiating T1 from T2 tumours [8, 9].”
• ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making. (2012, background): “In a meta-analysis, the sensitivity and the specificity of ERUS, MDCT and MRI for the prediction of nodal metastases in rectal cancer have been shown to be 67% and 78% for ERUS, 55% and 74% for CT and 66% and 76% for MRI, respectively [53].”