Daily energy intake and growth of piscivorous brown trout,Salmo trutta

By J. M. Elliott, M. Hurley. 2000

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8b7683eba9ffc05a6068aabb6dc367dbbba7471

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. Peter Mchugh
2. S. Larsson
3. P. Budy

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Peter Mchugh
2. S. Larsson
3. P. Budy
4. P. Jurajda

Citations in the corpus

• Seasonal growth patterns of wild juvenile fish: partitioning variation among explanatory variables, based on individual growth trajectories of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) parr (2005, background): “Elliott & Hurley 2000 ): we discuss this below, and estimate the magnitude and shape of the required seasonal adjustment (Fig. 2d,e).”
• An experimental evaluation of competitive and thermal effects on brown trout (Salmo trutta) and Bonneville cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii utah) performance along an altitudinal gradient (2005, methodology): “We contrasted minimum, mean, and maximum water temperatures from the six sites with the thermal growth optima of brown trout (13–18 °C; Elliott and Hurley 2000; Ojanguren et al. 2001) and cutthroat trout (13–19 °C; based on the optimum growth temperature – lethal temperature relationship of Jobling…”
• Thermal preference of Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus, and brown trout, Salmo trutta – implications for their niche segregation (2005, background): “This is supported by Elliott & Hurley (2000b), who reported that there is a conflict between speed of growth and efficiency of food conversion for brown trout and by Brett (1971), who showed that the temperature at which sockeye salmon experienced maximum growth rate decreased in correspondence…”
• Invasive gobies in the Danube: invasion success facilitated by availability and selection of superior food resources (2009, background): “Although fish may be a more valuable prey due to their higher nutritional value (Eliott & Hurley 2000), they are much less abundant than invertebrates due to their higher position at the trophic level.”