What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors

By Donald A. Jackson, P. Peres‐Neto, Julian D. Olden. 2001

1,261 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8ad033423a3f89bfa3742c157ee84af8e1c52ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Deep danger: intra-specific predation risk influences habitat use and aggregation formation of juvenile lemon sharks Negaprion brevirostris (2012, background): “Animals clearly make decisions about habitat use by assessing the abiotic conditions specific to their environment, for example water temperature, depth and salinity (Andrewartha & Birch 1954, Jackson et al. 2001).”
Contrasted impacts of climate change on stream fish assemblages along an environmental gradient (2009, background): “Although various competing factors (i.e. biotic, abiotic and spatial) have been identiﬁed in structuring stream ﬁsh assemblages (Jackson et al. , 2001), much of the debate on the mechanisms responsible for such a large-scale pattern has focused on the concepts of ‘addition’ versus ‘replacement’ of…”
Multidecadal trends for three declining fish species: habitat patterns and mechanisms in the San Francisco Estuary, California, USA (2007, background): “Factors affecting fish distribution often interact along spatial and temporal gradients (Jackson et al. 2001).”
Multiscale effects of flow regime and habitat and their interaction on fish assemblage structure in eastern Australia (2007, background): “In addition, our short-term flow predictors were unlikely to capture the influence of flow variation on biotic processes such as predator–prey relationships and competitive interactions among species that, in turn, can have significant effects on fish assemblage structure ( Jackson et al. 2001 ).”
Beta diversity of stream fish assemblages: partitioning variation between spatial and environmental factors (2017, background): “First, downstream reaches will have higher species richness due to higher habitat heterogeneity, volume and temporal stability (Jackson et al., 2001; Matthews, 1998; Schlosser, 1987).”
Native and Alien Fishes in a California Estuarine Marsh: Twenty‐One Years of Changing Assemblages (2002, background): “However, the scale of our study is more likely to detect interaction effects among species than those at larger scales (Jackson et al. 2001).”
Biogeography of Amazonian fishes: deconstructing river basins as biogeographic units (2017, background): “Within individual hydrographic basins, the distribution of a fish species is determined by a combination of biotic and abiotic factors that vary longitudinally in the hydrographic network (Vari, 1988; Jackson et al., 2001).”
Changing Fish Biodiversity: Predicting the Loss of Cyprinid Biodiversity Due to Global Climate Change (2002, background): “These effects are also strongly influenced by the size of the lake in which the species are found (Jackson et al. 2001).”
Secondary invasion of the round goby into high diversity Great Lakes tributaries and species at risk hotspots: potential new concerns for endangered freshwater species (2010, background): “Competition was defined as a shift in the organization of a community or an organism’s habitat created by the addition of round goby, but not due to predatory effects (Jackson et al. 2001).”
Paleoecology of the Greater Phyllopod Bed community, Burgess Shale (2008, background): “In most modern environments, predators regulate prey populations and potentially alter the species composition of communities (Jackson et al., 2001).”
Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on the distribution of trout and salmon along a longitudinal stream gradient (2005, background): “…1981), disease (e.g., de la Hoz Franco & Budy 2004), predation (e.g., Gilliam & Fraser 2001), and food availability (e.g., Bowlby & Roff 1986); abiotic factors that often affect fish distribution and abundance in streams include temperature and discharge (Jackson et al. 2001, Lobon-Cervia 2003).”