Radiation-use efficiency of modern and old spring cereal cultivars and its response to nitrogen in northern growing conditions

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Differences in yield, biomass and their components between triticale and wheat grown under contrasting water and nitrogen environments (2012, background): “The higher RUE in triticale respect to wheat could be due to its lower coefficient of light attenuation allowing a better light distribution through canopy (Green, 1989; Miralles and Slafer, 1997; Muurinen and Peltonen-Sainio, 2006).”
Accumulation and Translocation of Nitrogen in Spring Cereal Cultivars Differing in Nitrogen Use Efficiency (2007, background): “Our modified BPEvege values for spring cereals showed that wheat had high vegetative biomass production even during the end of the growing season in each year, which was in line with the average total biomass results from 90 kg N ha21 treatment (wheat, 1180 g m22; oat, 1470 g m22; barley, 1065 g m22”
Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. (2010, background): “For example, the εc of oat is higher before heading compared to postheading; in contrast, barley and wheat showed higher εc after heading (86).”