INTRASPECIFIC GENETIC DIVERSITY IN THE MARINE COCCOLITHOPHORE EMILIANIA HUXLEYI (PRYMNESIOPHYCEAE): THE USE OF MICROSATELLITE ANALYSIS IN MARINE PHYTOPLANKTON POPULATION STUDIES 1

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Poleward expansion of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi (2014, background): “…ability to adapt to a broad range of environments and maintain extensive blooms in nearly every marine biome is likely due to its extensive genetic (Iglesias-Rodrı́guez et al., 2006; Read et al., 2013) and ecophenotypic plasticity (Langer et al., 2009) that should give it a competitive advantage.”
Emiliania huxleyi shows identical responses to elevated pCO2 in TA and DIC manipulations (2011, background): “General response patterns of E. huxleyi A noteworthy degree of intraspecific variability has been reported for E. huxleyi with regard to morphology, physiology and genetics (Iglesias-Rodríguez et al., 2006; Paasche, 2002; Young, 1994).”
Reviews and Syntheses: Responses of coccolithophores to ocean acidification: a meta-analysis (2015, background): “A high physiological variability has already been shown to exist in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi (Iglesias-Rodriguez et al., 2006; Cubillos et al., 2007), with different strains and ecotypes exhibiting diverse responses to ocean acidification (Langer et al.”
Calcification morphotypes of the coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi in the Southern Ocean: changes in 2001 to 2006 compared to historical data (2007, methodology): “Iglesias-Rodriguez et al. (2002, 2006) further corroborated a high degree of polymorphism in 87 isolates of different geographical origin using AFLP and microsatellite loci.”