Non-essentialist methods in pre-Darwinian taxonomy

By M. Winsor. 2003

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, History and Philosophy of Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e88a3d273fb518300a9526173eed750a80230990

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Robert A. Wilson
2. D. R. Sadler *

In History and Philosophy of Science

1. Ingo Brigandt
2. Robert A. Wilson
3. D. R. Sadler *
4. Marc Ereshefsky

In Plant Science

1. Robert A. Wilson
2. D. R. Sadler *

Citations in the corpus

• When Traditional Essentialism Fails: Biological Natural Kinds (2007, background): “…view of the so-called history of essentialism is a contentious construction and is mistaken in significant ways (Amundson 2005; Atran 1990; Camardi 2001; McOuat 1996; Müller-Wille 1999, 2003; Rupke 1993; Stevens 1984, 1994, 1997; Scharf 2007; Wilkins 2004; Winsor 2003a, 2003b, 2006a, 2006b).”
• The futility of attempting to codify academic achievement standards (2014, background): “Despite differences in terminology and reasoning, strong elements of convergence have been identified (Needham 1975; Winsor 2003).”