The MONICA model: Testing predictability for crop growth, soil moisture and nitrogen dynamics

By Claas Nendel, M. Berg, K. Kersebaum, W. Mirschel, X. Specka, M. Wegehenkel, K. Wenkel, Ralf Wieland. 2011

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e881d7c9f9f9d16373a48429b5946fe1c6195994

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Frank Ewert
2. Kenneth J. Boote

In Plant Science

1. P. Sentelhas
2. Frank Ewert
3. Pierre Martre
4. Kenneth J. Boote

In Soil Science

1. Frank Ewert
2. Pierre Martre

Citations in the corpus

• Modeling Soil Processes: Review, Key Challenges, and New Perspectives (2016, unknown): “org/models/model-descriptions/expert-n), MONICA (Nendel et al., 2011), and HUME (Kage and Stuetzel, 1999; Ratjen, 2012).”
• Testing farm management options as climate change adaptation strategies using the MONICA model (2014, methodology): “The MONICA model (Nendel et al., 2011) is the latest generation of HERMES (Kersebaum, 1995, 2007) model versions and was extended for the carbon cycle in soil and plant.”
• Inter-comparison of performance of soybean crop simulation models and their ensemble in southern Brazil (2017, methodology): “Besides FAO and CROPGRO, 64 AQUACROP (RAES et al., 2012), APSIM (KEATING et al., 2003), and MONICA 65 (NENDEL et al., 2011) models also stand out as the primary models for simulating growth, 66 development, and yields of different crops, including soybean.”
• Designing future barley ideotypes using a crop model ensemble (2017, methodology): “2.5) Nendel et al., 2011 http://monica.agrosystem-models.com SIMPLACE”