Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your…

By Fernando Gomez, Carlos Segami

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Erik Zawadzki
2. Asher Lipson
3. Tuomas Sandholm
4. Kevin Leyton-Brown
5. Jakob N. Foerster
6. Frank Hutter
7. Holger H. Hoos
8. Katharina Eggensperger

Citations in the corpus

• Empirically Evaluating Multiagent Learning Algorithms (2014, methodology): “AWESOME (Conitzer and Sandholm, 2003; Conitzer and Sandholm, 2007) tracks the opponent’s behavior in different periods of play and tries to maintain hypotheses about its play.”
• The State of Solving Large Incomplete-Information Games, and Application to Poker (2010, methodology): “For example, the first phase can include rounds 1, 2, and 3, while the second phase can include rounds 3 and 4 (Gilpin and Sandholm 2007a).”