The duelling models: NEG vs amenity migration in explaining US engines of growth

275 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Economic Performance of European Cities and City Regions: Myths and Realities (2013, background): “In addition, and somewhat overlaying all of these arguments, there is also evidence of natural amenity-driven migration flows (Partridge, 2010) which in the long run may be quantitatively larger than the urban migration effects (Partridge, 2010), with the largest flows being to cities in favourable ”
A World in Emergence: Notes Toward a Resynthesis of Urban-Economic Geography for the 21st Century (2011, background): “…induces them to put their faith in the explanatory primacy of individual utility maximization and the privileged power of enticements such as sunshine, sumptuary services, and social diversity as the foundations of current urban growth (see especially Glaeser et al., 2001 and Partridge, 2010).”
Economic and Social Development along the Urban-Rural Continuum: New Opportunities to Inform Policy (2021, background): “Indeed, as Partridge (2010) and Dijkstra et al. (2013), Dijkstra et al. (2015) point out, intermediate-sized cities also have the advantage of generally being the fastest growing cities across the developed world.”