CAN THE MAXIMIN PRINCIPLE SERVE AS A BASIS FOR MORALITY? A CRITIQUE OF JOHN RAWLS'S THEORY*§

By I. Introduction. 1980

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Tatsunori B. Hashimoto
2. Percy Liang
3. Megha Srivastava
4. Shiori Sagawa
5. Hongseok Namkoong
6. Mohit Bansal
7. Yoshua Bengio
8. Sergey Levine

Citations in the corpus

• Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimization (2018, background): “Examples of such critiques are the focus on an abstract worst-off group rather than demographic groups or individuals (Altham, 1973), extreme risk-aversion (Mueller et al., 1974), and utilitarianism with diminishing returns as an alternative (Harsanyi, 1975).”