A hedonic analysis of the demand for and benefits of urban recreation parks

By Neelam C. Poudyal, D. Hodges, C. Merrett. 2009

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Preferences for urban green spaces and peri-urban forests: An analysis of stated residential choices (2016, background): “…& Miettinen, 000), or increase with the proportion of forest land in the region Hand, Thacher, McCollum, and Berrens, 2008), and that access to rban parks has a significant value for the local population as well Hoshino & Kuriyama, 2010; Poudyal, Hodges, & Merrett, 2009; ander & Polasky, 2009).”
Spatial effects of accessibility to parks on housing prices in Shenzhen, China (2017, methodology): “…housing prices typically classify the influential variables into different categoriesdsuch as structural variables, neighbourhood characteristics, and market and environmental variablesdand use them as independent variables (Ali et al., 2015; Poudyal et al., 2009; Wen & Jia, 2004; Wu et al., 2015).”
Landscape amenities and local development: a review of migration, regional economic and hedonic pricing studies (2010, background): “Positive effects were found for urban forests (Luttik, 2000; Mansfield et al., 2005; Netusil, 2005; Poudyal et al., 2009; Tyrväinen and Miettinen, 2000) or forest preserves (Thorsnes, 2002).”