Demand for gasoline is more price-inelastic than commonly thought

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Price Elasticity of Electricity Demand in the United States: A Three-Dimensional Analysis (2017, background): “Demand for road-sector gasoline is typically found to be more price inelastic; Havranek et al.’s (2012) meta-analysis concluded that the long-run price elasticity is likely to be around −0.3.”
A meta-analysis on the price elasticity of energy demand (2017, unknown): “Havranek et al. (2012), on the other hand, approached this issue through a metaanalysis of the estimates of gasoline demand elasticities across different countries.”
Determinants of Horizontal Spillovers from FDI: Evidence from a Large Meta-Analysis (2013, background): “An important concern in meta-analysis is publication selection bias (see, for example, Stanley, 2001, 2005; Havranek, 2010; Havranek et al., 2012): some estimates of spillovers may be more likely to be selected for publication than others.”
Bank Competition and Financial Stability: Much Ado About Nothing? (2015, unknown): “Therefore, we can infer that these funnel plots do not point to the presence of publication bias in the competition-stability literature, as opposed to the findings in most other fields in economics and finance (for example, Havranek and Irsova, 2011; Havranek and Irsova, 2012; Havranek et al., 2012”