A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery.
By N. Khan, A. De Souza, R. Mister, M. Flather, J. Clague, S. Davies, P. Collins, Duolao Wang, U. Sigwart, J. Pepper. New England Journal of Medicine, 2004
632 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e853543db91ac9a95c8704c42fd448a6061868f5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
In Surgery
Citations in the corpus
- [Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary]. (2006, methodology): “Randomized trials comparing off-pump with the standard procedure are now available with no difference demonstrated in outcome in the first 1–3 years after surgery between off-pump and standard groups,(240,241) More recently, Khan et al.(242) in a further randomized trial with angiographic follow-up ”
- ACCF/AHA Practice Guideline 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (2011, background): “2004 (279) To compare graft-patency rates and clinical outcomes in off-pump surgery with conventional, "on-pump"”
- 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesi (2011, background): “To date, the results of several RCTs comparing on-pump and off-pump CABG in various patient populations have been published (61,67,68).”