Understanding e-Governance for Development

355 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

E-government adoption: architecture and barriers (2005, background): “…(2002)Inadequate network capacity or bandwidth Fletcher and Wright (1995) Lack resources standards and common architecture policies and definitions Heeks (2001)Existing systems are incompatible and complex Layne and Lee (2001)Existing internal systems have restrictions regarding their integrating…”
Can information and communications technology applications contribute to poverty reduction? Lessons from rural India (2003, background): “a human intermediary between them and ICT, in what is termed a “reintermediation model” [18].”
E-Government in developing countries: Experiences from sub-Saharan Africa (2009, background): “Due to the problem of internet access, such a perspective is poorly suited to lessdeveloped countries in sub-Saharan Africa (Heeks, 2001a).”
Towards excellence in e‐governance (2005, background): “Moreover, e-government in developing countries must accommodate certain unique conditions, needs and obstacles ( Heeks, 2001”
Interpreting e-government and development: Efficiency, transparency or governance at a distance? (2005, background): “Does the model of state enabled by e-government really support development (Heeks, 2001)? However, e-government is supposed to be conducive to development, by sustaining good governance.”