Japanese Research Consortia: A Microeconometric Analysis of Industrial Policy

By Lee G. Branstetter, Mariko Sakakibara. 2003

277 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e842df4ba43a7d032a9860f1e969dac56fc95ba5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms (2006, background): “Technological diversification and R&D intensity 9 This seems to be a reasonable number of classes, also Jaffe (1986) constructed 49 categories, Branstetter and Sakakibara (1998) and Sakakibara (2001) constructed 50.”
The Link between R&D Subsidies, R&D Spending and Technological Performance (2004, background): “Other regressors are rather sparingly used.4 The only studies on research productivity measured by patents and tech4Examples are spill–over measures (cf. Jaffe, 1986, Cincera, 1997); or the book value of firms (cf. Hall et al., 1986) 7 nology policy are Branstetter and Sakakibara (1998, 2002).”
Do Cooperative Research and Development (R&D) Subsidies Stimulate Regional Innovation Efficiency? Evidence from Germany (2015, background): “BRANSTETTER and SAKAKIBARA (1998) show that the support of research consortia by the Japanese government positively influences the achieved outcomes.”
Research Joint Ventures and Firm Level Performance (2002, background): “Branstetter and Sakakibara (1998) study the impact of participation in Japanese government sponsored RJVs on firms’ R&D expenses, patenting activities and spillovers. Using a sample of 226 Japanese firms observed from 1983 to 1989, these authors find that participation in RJVs has a positive impact ”
Innovation Strategies and Employment in Latin American Firms (2012, background): “6 See also: Branstetter and Sakakibara (1998), Kaiser (2002), and Belderbos, Lokshin,, and Carree (2008), among others.”