The European Pulsar Timing Array and the Large European Array for Pulsars

By Michael Kramer, David J. Champion. 2013

282 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e819346f2bd6265c9c5790e9bf73075fe8eb9064

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

Citations in the corpus

Gravitational-wave sensitivity curves (2014, methodology): “ improving. All that is required by the denition in (19) is that the ratio h c(f)=h n(f) is constant. 4.4.1. Current PTAs The PTAs currently in operation are the European Pulsar Timing Array (EPTAk; Kramer and Champion, 2013), the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array (PPTA{; Hobbs, 2013) based in Australia, a”
Gravitational-wave cosmology across 29 decades in frequency (2015, background): “North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) [57], and the European Pulsar Timing Array (EPTA) [58].”
European Pulsar Timing Array Limits On An Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background (2015, methodology): “We note the significant improvement of the EPTA result in comparison to that presented in Sanidas et al. (2012), which was ∼3 times less constraining than the best available limit at that time, set by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe 7-yr+ACT results.”
Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA (2019, background): “These figures plot the SGWB for a set of representative values of Gμ together with the current sensitivity curves for EPTA pulsar timing collaboration [158], as well as the projected curves for the SKA [159] and LISA [56] collaborations.”
The Effelsberg-Bonn H i Survey: Milky Way gas - First data release (2015, background): “For these projects, a larger bandwidth of 250 MHz is desired (e.g., Kramer & Champion 2013; Barr et al. 2013).”
Timing analysis for 20 millisecond pulsars in the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array (2015, background): “These algorithms have successfully been used by the NANOGrav and European Pulsar Timing Array groups (e.g. van Haasteren et al. 2011; Arzoumanian et al. 2014).”
Selection bias in dynamically measured supermassive black hole samples: its consequences and the quest for the most fundamental relation (2016, background): “…relation is also a key ingredient in predicting what pulsar timing array searches (e.g., Sesana et al. 2008; Hobbs et al. 2010; Sesana2013; Kramer & Champion 2013; Rosado & Sesana 2014; Rosado et al. 2015) for gravitational radiation will see (Bonnor & Rotenberg 1961; Peres 1962;…”
European Pulsar Timing Array Limits on Continuous Gravitational Waves from Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries (2015, methodology): “The European Pulsar Timing Array (EPTA, Kramer & Champion 2013), the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array (PPTA, Hobbs 2013) and the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav, McLaughlin 2013), joining together in the International Pulsar Timing Array (IPTA, Hobbs et al. 2010;…”
Searching for isotropic stochastic gravitational-wave background in the international pulsar timing array second data release (2021, unknown): “Array (EPTA) [16], the North American Nanoherz Observatory © 2022 Institute of Theoretical Physics CAS, Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing Printed in China and the UK Communications in Theoretical Physics”
The NANOGrav 11-year Data Set: High-precision Timing of 45 Millisecond Pulsars (2017, methodology): “Similar programs are being carried out by the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array (Hobbs 2013; Reardon et al. 2016) and the European Pulsar Timing Array (Kramer & Champion 2013; Desvignes et al. 2016).”