Variation partitioning in ecological communities: Do the numbers add up?

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Less than eight (and a half) misconceptions of spatial analysis (2012, background): “…data (Dormann et al., 2007; Carl et al., 2008; Beale et al., 2010), of which spatial eigenvector filtering is just one, but possibly not the best, as it tends to overfit the independent spatial signal in analyses (Gilbert & Bennett, 2010). non that a regression coefficient may vary across space.”
Testing the Mantel statistic with a spatially‐constrained permutation procedure (2019, methodology): “Spatial autocorrelation is a problem regularly underlined when quantifying the spatial structure of genetic (Manel et al., 2010) and community data (Gilbert & Bennett, 2010; Smith & Lundholm, 2010) and our procedure could solve this issue by providing an alternative distance- based statistical…”
Assembly mechanisms determining high species turnover in aquatic communities over regional and continental scales (2016, background): “…to represent niche processes; while, after accounting for the effect of the environment, a significant effect of the spatial structure is usually taken to indicate dispersal limitation (though interpretation must be cautious; see a discussion in Gilbert and Bennett 2010, Smith and Lundholm 2010).”